Crystallography Open Database
- COD Home
- Accessing COD Data
- Add Your Data
- Documentation
Information card for entry 7217998
Preview
| Coordinates | 7217998.cif |
|---|---|
| Original paper (by DOI) | HTML |
| Chemical name | bis-1,2,3-Triamino-2,4,6-triazinium ethylenetriaminetetraacetate diaqua |
|---|---|
| Formula | C16 H32 N14 O10 |
| Calculated formula | C16 H32 N14 O10 |
| SMILES | c1(nc([nH+]c(n1)N)N)N.[O-]C(=O)C[NH+](CC(=O)[O-])CC[NH+](CC(=O)[O-])CC(=O)[O-].O.c1(nc([nH+]c(n1)N)N)N.O |
| Title of publication | The influence of hydrogen bonding on the planar arrangement of melamine in crystal structures of its solvates, cocrystals and salts |
| Authors of publication | Vella-Zarb, Liana; Braga, Dario; Guy Orpen, A.; Baisch, Ulrich |
| Journal of publication | CrystEngComm |
| Year of publication | 2014 |
| Journal volume | 16 |
| Journal issue | 35 |
| Pages of publication | 8147 |
| a | 7.0884 ± 0.0003 Å |
| b | 7.715 ± 0.0002 Å |
| c | 11.634 ± 0.0005 Å |
| α | 80.755 ± 0.003° |
| β | 78.037 ± 0.004° |
| γ | 83.455 ± 0.003° |
| Cell volume | 612.18 ± 0.04 Å3 |
| Cell temperature | 296.15 K |
| Ambient diffraction temperature | 296.15 K |
| Number of distinct elements | 4 |
| Space group number | 2 |
| Hermann-Mauguin space group symbol | P -1 |
| Hall space group symbol | -P 1 |
| Residual factor for all reflections | 0.0655 |
| Residual factor for significantly intense reflections | 0.0339 |
| Weighted residual factors for significantly intense reflections | 0.0832 |
| Weighted residual factors for all reflections included in the refinement | 0.0892 |
| Goodness-of-fit parameter for all reflections included in the refinement | 0.897 |
| Diffraction radiation wavelength | 0.71073 Å |
| Diffraction radiation type | MoKα |
| Duplicate of | 7216829 |
| Has coordinates | Yes |
| Has disorder | No |
| Has Fobs | No |
| Revision | Date | Message | Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| 180510 (current) | 2016-03-26 | cif/7/21/ (antanas@kurmis) Replacing _[local]_cod_* tags with their equivalents from the COD CIF dictionary in multiple entries in subrange 7/21/79. |
7217998.cif |
| 124581 | 2014-10-05 | cif/ (saulius@koala.ibt.lt) Marking up 890 duplicates of COD. The duplicates were indentified as entries havin identical DOIs, cell length parameters and formulae, unspecified or identical RI R-factors, and not already marked as duplicates or suboptimal structures. Furthermore, coordinates had to be identical when comparing results of cif2ref conversion: codsql \ 'select d1.file, d1.doi, d2.file, d2.doi from data as d1 join data as d2 on d1.doi = d2.doi where d1.a = d2.a and d1.b = d2.b and d1.c = d2.c and d1.duplicateof is null and d2.duplicateof is null and d1.optimal is null and d2.optimal is null and (d1.RI is null or d2.RI is null or d1.RI = d2.RI) and d1.file > d2.file and (d1.formula = d2.formula or d1.calcformula = d2.calcformula)' \ -NB \ | awk '{print $1, $3}' \ | xargs codid2file \ | xargs -n2 \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ CIF2=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}"); \ echo -e "\n=== {} ==="; \ diff -bw -u <(cif2ref $CIF1) <(cif2ref $CIF2)' \ | perl -00 -ne 'print unless /^(-|\+)/m' \ | grep . > ~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst The resulting '~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst' was post-processed as follows: awk '{print $2, $3}' duplicates-2014-10-05.lst \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ ID2=$(basename $(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}") .cif); \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ set -x; echo _cod_duplicate_entry $ID2 >> $CIF1' Structures from one powder diffraction paper were reverted: svn revert /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/4/12/19/412199[567].cif And two files with more than one duplicate identified were fixed by hand: emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054322.cif emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054325.cif |
7217998.cif |
| 123196 | 2014-09-07 | cif/ Adding structures of 7217998, 7217999, 7218000, 7218001, 7218002 via cif-deposit CGI script. |
7217998.cif |
All data in the COD and the database itself are dedicated to the
public domain and licensed under the
CC0
License
.
Users of the data should acknowledge the original authors of the
structural data.