Crystallography Open Database
- COD Home
- Accessing COD Data
- Add Your Data
- Documentation
Information card for entry 7218006
Preview
Coordinates | 7218006.cif |
---|---|
Original paper (by DOI) | HTML |
Common name | S-naproxen D-tryptophan monohydrate |
---|---|
Chemical name | (+)-(S)-2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl) propanoic acid (2R)-2-amino-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)propanoic acid monohydrate |
Formula | C25 H28 N2 O6 |
Calculated formula | C25 H28 N2 O6 |
SMILES | c1(c[nH]c2ccccc12)C[C@@H]([NH3+])C(=O)[O-].c1cc2cc(ccc2cc1[C@H](C)C(=O)O)OC.O |
Title of publication | Structural insight into cocrystallization with zwitterionic co-formers: cocrystals of S-naproxen |
Authors of publication | Tumanova, Natalia; Tumanov, Nikolay; Robeyns, Koen; Filinchuk, Yaroslav; Wouters, Johan; Leyssens, Tom |
Journal of publication | CrystEngComm |
Year of publication | 2014 |
Journal volume | 16 |
Journal issue | 35 |
Pages of publication | 8185 |
a | 5.88418 ± 0.00016 Å |
b | 11.3844 ± 0.0003 Å |
c | 34.6863 ± 0.0009 Å |
α | 90° |
β | 90° |
γ | 90° |
Cell volume | 2323.56 ± 0.11 Å3 |
Cell temperature | 150 ± 2 K |
Ambient diffraction temperature | 150 ± 2 K |
Number of distinct elements | 4 |
Space group number | 19 |
Hermann-Mauguin space group symbol | P 21 21 21 |
Hall space group symbol | P 2ac 2ab |
Residual factor for all reflections | 0.0688 |
Residual factor for significantly intense reflections | 0.046 |
Weighted residual factors for significantly intense reflections | 0.0901 |
Weighted residual factors for all reflections included in the refinement | 0.0992 |
Goodness-of-fit parameter for all reflections included in the refinement | 1.033 |
Diffraction radiation probe | x-ray |
Diffraction radiation wavelength | 0.71073 Å |
Diffraction radiation type | MoKα |
Duplicate of | 7215889 |
Has coordinates | Yes |
Has disorder | No |
Has Fobs | No |
Revision | Date | Message | Files |
---|---|---|---|
180511 (current) | 2016-03-26 | cif/7/21/ (antanas@kurmis) Replacing _[local]_cod_* tags with their equivalents from the COD CIF dictionary in multiple entries in subrange 7/21/80. |
7218006.cif |
124581 | 2014-10-05 | cif/ (saulius@koala.ibt.lt) Marking up 890 duplicates of COD. The duplicates were indentified as entries havin identical DOIs, cell length parameters and formulae, unspecified or identical RI R-factors, and not already marked as duplicates or suboptimal structures. Furthermore, coordinates had to be identical when comparing results of cif2ref conversion: codsql \ 'select d1.file, d1.doi, d2.file, d2.doi from data as d1 join data as d2 on d1.doi = d2.doi where d1.a = d2.a and d1.b = d2.b and d1.c = d2.c and d1.duplicateof is null and d2.duplicateof is null and d1.optimal is null and d2.optimal is null and (d1.RI is null or d2.RI is null or d1.RI = d2.RI) and d1.file > d2.file and (d1.formula = d2.formula or d1.calcformula = d2.calcformula)' \ -NB \ | awk '{print $1, $3}' \ | xargs codid2file \ | xargs -n2 \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ CIF2=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}"); \ echo -e "\n=== {} ==="; \ diff -bw -u <(cif2ref $CIF1) <(cif2ref $CIF2)' \ | perl -00 -ne 'print unless /^(-|\+)/m' \ | grep . > ~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst The resulting '~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst' was post-processed as follows: awk '{print $2, $3}' duplicates-2014-10-05.lst \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ ID2=$(basename $(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}") .cif); \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ set -x; echo _cod_duplicate_entry $ID2 >> $CIF1' Structures from one powder diffraction paper were reverted: svn revert /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/4/12/19/412199[567].cif And two files with more than one duplicate identified were fixed by hand: emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054322.cif emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054325.cif |
7218006.cif |
123198 | 2014-09-07 | cif/ Adding structures of 7218004, 7218005, 7218006, 7218007 via cif-deposit CGI script. |
7218006.cif |
All data in the COD and the database itself are dedicated to the
public domain and licensed under the
CC0
License
.
Users of the data should acknowledge the original authors of the
structural data.